|Topic Review (Newest First)|
|06-14-2011 08:59 PM|
I've recently done a 301 mile trip with 298 of them on motorway and a small amount on dual carriageway and I averaged 33.64mpg and Idid not driving economicaly , on purpose, so as to get the worst case result. I would have got better MPG if I had keep my speed on the motorway down to about 65mph.I have now averaged 29.49mpg over 1114 miles. I had averaged, before this trip, 28.83 which is what I will expect to get now on normal driving. This a lot less then the quoted mpg which shows I should be getting about 35mpg.I always fill up to the brim, but I also keep very accurate mpg figures. I only fill up before a run as otherwise a fill up from the petrol station's cool tanks will expand out of the car's tank on a warm day.
|06-08-2011 01:25 PM|
Thanks, yep its OK, but thought it would be a bit better. I used to have a performance diesel hatchback a couple of years back and that got about the same.Much better than my previous car though which as a little hot hatch which at best got about 30mpg.
|06-08-2011 03:58 AM|
Sounds OK to me, I think most people would be happy with those figures.
|06-08-2011 03:54 AM|
I have had my c-max 1.8 TDCi for around 3 months now, and the best I can average is around 41.5-43.5 mpg ona 16 mile journey to work (mix of A-Roads, bit of the M1 then sat in traffic).
On a long run I did manage 56mpgDoes this seem about right?
|06-03-2011 03:02 AM|
Thanks for the interesting responses guys. [img]smileys/smiley32.gif[/img]
Apologies also for hi-jacking a thread on mpg...
Funnily enough, I have just been up to Manchester and back in a new Meriva (hire car) and the speedo on that was even worse (when compared with gps speed), although within the specs suggested.
I admit to having made an assumption in that both the speedo and milometer on the C Max are fed from the same source (anyone know?). If different then the assumption is false. The only proof, as suggested earlier, will be to try to compare the mileometer to a gps mile (flat & open) and see if I can get a result.
|06-02-2011 03:57 PM|
I've just checked the original legislation which is EC Directive 75/443 which gives the following
4.3.5 the vehicle is tested at the following three speeds: 40, 80 and 120 km/h, or 80 % of the maximum speed specified by the manufacturer, if this is inferior to 150 km/h;<?: prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-comfficeffice" />
4.4. The speed indicated must never be less than the true speed. At the speeds specified for the test in 4.3.5 above and between these speeds, there shall be the following relationship between the speed indicated on the dial of the speedometer (V1) and the true speed (V2):
V1 - V2 ≤ V2/10 + 4 km/h
|06-02-2011 02:35 PM|
Originally Posted by Richard G
You're correct that they cannot under-read.
|06-01-2011 11:29 PM|
Originally Posted by shaz
The speedo is allowed to show upto 3MPH more than the speed you are doing but not to show a lower speed than you are doing (provided you have the correct size (range of sizes) of tyres
|06-01-2011 11:23 PM|
Should have said " indicated speed showing HIGHER" not lower, my fault for posting after a couple of glasses of red wine!
|06-01-2011 11:15 PM|
Originally Posted by And3T
|This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.|